use synced aptly by brycekahle · Pull Request #50403 · DataDog/datadog-agent

brycekahle · 2026-05-05T23:22:46Z

What does this PR do?

Uses a synced version of github.com/DataDog/aptly that does not have the module renamed, so we use a replace directive in go.mod.

Motivation

Our renamed fork was pretty outdated. This will make it easier to keep synced with upstream.

Describe how you validated your changes

KMT tests.

Additional Notes

dd-octo-sts · 2026-05-05T23:30:17Z

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: f8a86d4
Comparison: 97c3e12

binary

os

arch

change

system-probe

linux

amd64

+15, -7

+cloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/aptly
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/database
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/deb
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/http
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/pgp
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/utils
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/aptly
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/database
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/deb
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/http
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/pgp
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/utils
-github.com/pborman/uuid
+github.com/saracen/walker
+golang.org/x/oauth2
+golang.org/x/oauth2/authhandler
+golang.org/x/oauth2/google
+golang.org/x/oauth2/google/externalaccount
+golang.org/x/oauth2/internal
+golang.org/x/oauth2/jws
+golang.org/x/oauth2/jwt

system-probe

linux

arm64

+15, -7

+cloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/aptly
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/database
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/deb
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/http
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/pgp
-github.com/DataDog/aptly/utils
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/aptly
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/database
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/deb
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/http
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/pgp
+github.com/aptly-dev/aptly/utils
-github.com/pborman/uuid
+github.com/saracen/walker
+golang.org/x/oauth2
+golang.org/x/oauth2/authhandler
+golang.org/x/oauth2/google
+golang.org/x/oauth2/google/externalaccount
+golang.org/x/oauth2/internal
+golang.org/x/oauth2/jws
+golang.org/x/oauth2/jwt

dd-octo-sts · 2026-05-05T23:52:51Z

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor f8a86d4f:

Results for datadog-agent_7.80.0~devel.git.535.97c3e12.pipeline.111841341-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 · 2026-05-05T23:53:23Z

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 0.00%
• Overall Coverage: 50.09% (-0.16%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 97c3e12 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-05-06T00:16:17Z

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: cb1bfe4d-89fe-4120-8e82-64f3e2858cd4

Baseline: c88f72e
Comparison: 97c3e12
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	+2.65	[-0.34, +5.64]	1	Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	+2.65	[-0.34, +5.64]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_syslog_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	+0.81	[+0.60, +1.02]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory utilization	+0.49	[+0.24, +0.75]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	memory utilization	+0.49	[+0.45, +0.52]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	memory utilization	+0.35	[+0.25, +0.46]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	ddot_logs	memory utilization	+0.21	[+0.14, +0.27]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	+0.20	[+0.16, +0.24]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	otlp_ingest_logs	memory utilization	+0.16	[+0.06, +0.27]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	+0.08	[+0.03, +0.12]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.08	[-0.37, +0.52]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_security_idle	memory utilization	+0.06	[-0.01, +0.13]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_delta	memory utilization	+0.06	[-0.12, +0.24]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.03	[-0.38, +0.43]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude	ingress throughput	+0.01	[-0.08, +0.10]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.01	[-0.14, +0.16]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api	ingress throughput	-0.01	[-0.22, +0.20]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3	ingress throughput	-0.01	[-0.22, +0.20]	1	Logs
➖	otlp_ingest_metrics	memory utilization	-0.08	[-0.23, +0.07]	1	Logs
➖	docker_containers_memory	memory utilization	-0.10	[-0.20, +0.01]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.10	[-0.60, +0.40]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter	memory utilization	-0.12	[-0.36, +0.12]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders	memory utilization	-0.15	[-0.20, -0.10]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative	memory utilization	-0.21	[-0.37, -0.05]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics	memory utilization	-0.28	[-0.48, -0.09]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	-0.36	[-1.35, +0.63]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	observed_value	links
✅	docker_containers_cpu	simple_check_run	10/10	521 ≥ 26
✅	docker_containers_memory	memory_usage	10/10	243.85MiB ≤ 370MiB
✅	docker_containers_memory	simple_check_run	10/10	699 ≥ 26
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10	0.16GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10	0.21GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10	0.17GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10	0.18GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B
✅	quality_gate_idle	intake_connections	10/10	3 ≤ 4	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	141.19MiB ≤ 147MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	intake_connections	10/10	3 ≤ 4	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10	474.21MiB ≤ 495MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	intake_connections	10/10	4 ≤ 6	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10	177.00MiB ≤ 195MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	cpu_usage	10/10	351.00 ≤ 2000	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	intake_connections	10/10	3 ≤ 6	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory_usage	10/10	375.20MiB ≤ 430MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_idle	cpu_usage	10/10	24.84 ≤ 40	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_idle	memory_usage	10/10	292.40MiB ≤ 330MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	cpu_usage	10/10	54.86 ≤ 70	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	memory_usage	10/10	266.30MiB ≤ 320MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	cpu_usage	10/10	20.56 ≤ 40	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	memory_usage	10/10	282.43MiB ≤ 320MiB	bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

dd-octo-sts · 2026-05-06T00:59:37Z

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor f8a86d4
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

	Quality gate	Change	Size (prev → curr → max)
✅	agent_deb_amd64	+229.32 KiB (0.03% increase)	742.270 → 742.494 → 750.310
✅	agent_deb_amd64_fips	+234.19 KiB (0.03% increase)	700.340 → 700.569 → 702.690
✅	agent_rpm_amd64	+229.32 KiB (0.03% increase)	742.253 → 742.477 → 750.280
✅	agent_rpm_amd64_fips	+234.19 KiB (0.03% increase)	700.324 → 700.553 → 702.670
✅	agent_rpm_arm64	+213.02 KiB (0.03% increase)	720.170 → 720.378 → 724.050
✅	agent_rpm_arm64_fips	+212.02 KiB (0.03% increase)	681.332 → 681.539 → 684.460
✅	agent_suse_amd64	+229.32 KiB (0.03% increase)	742.253 → 742.477 → 750.280
✅	agent_suse_amd64_fips	+234.19 KiB (0.03% increase)	700.324 → 700.553 → 702.670
✅	agent_suse_arm64	+213.02 KiB (0.03% increase)	720.170 → 720.378 → 724.050
✅	agent_suse_arm64_fips	+212.02 KiB (0.03% increase)	681.332 → 681.539 → 684.460
✅	docker_agent_amd64	+229.31 KiB (0.03% increase)	802.512 → 802.736 → 805.870
✅	docker_agent_arm64	+213.02 KiB (0.03% increase)	805.269 → 805.477 → 809.730
✅	docker_agent_jmx_amd64	+229.32 KiB (0.02% increase)	993.432 → 993.656 → 996.590
✅	docker_agent_jmx_arm64	+213.02 KiB (0.02% increase)	984.968 → 985.176 → 989.410

19 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)

	Quality gate	Current Size
✅	agent_heroku_amd64	309.209 MiB
✅	agent_msi	608.068 MiB
✅	docker_cluster_agent_amd64	206.607 MiB
✅	docker_cluster_agent_arm64	220.634 MiB
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64	7.142 MiB
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64	6.689 MiB
✅	docker_host_profiler_amd64	301.579 MiB
✅	docker_host_profiler_arm64	313.054 MiB
✅	docker_dogstatsd_amd64	39.492 MiB
✅	docker_dogstatsd_arm64	37.690 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_deb_amd64	30.145 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_deb_arm64	28.275 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_rpm_amd64	30.145 MiB
✅	dogstatsd_suse_amd64	30.145 MiB
✅	iot_agent_deb_amd64	44.470 MiB
✅	iot_agent_deb_arm64	41.450 MiB
✅	iot_agent_deb_armhf	42.186 MiB
✅	iot_agent_rpm_amd64	44.470 MiB
✅	iot_agent_suse_amd64	44.470 MiB

github-actions Bot added the component/system-probe label May 5, 2026

dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label May 5, 2026

github-actions Bot added the medium review PR review might take time label May 5, 2026

dd-octo-sts Bot added the team/ebpf-platform label May 5, 2026

brycekahle added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels May 6, 2026

brycekahle added 2 commits May 6, 2026 11:58

use synced aptly

578bd49

fix license

97c3e12

brycekahle force-pushed the bryce.kahle/aptly-update branch from a4c8776 to 97c3e12 Compare May 6, 2026 19:06

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

use synced aptly#50403

use synced aptly#50403
brycekahle wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
bryce.kahle/aptly-update

brycekahle commented May 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented May 5, 2026 •

edited by datadog-official Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Experiments ignored for regressions

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

Explanation

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Info

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

brycekahle commented May 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Additional Notes

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Go Package Import Differences

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Files inventory check summary

Results for datadog-agent_7.80.0~devel.git.535.97c3e12.pipeline.111841341-1_amd64.deb:

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented May 5, 2026 • edited by datadog-official Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

Explanation

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Static quality checks

Info

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

brycekahle commented May 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented May 5, 2026 •

edited by datadog-official Bot

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading